Mon premier blog

Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong J. L. Mackie
Publisher:

Mackie's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. [3] See, of course, in particular Mackie, J.L. Intro Mackie represents the position in meta-ethics known a moral skepticism. However, looking at the writings of J. (1977), Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Harmondsworth: Penguin. See Joshua Greene's The Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Truth About Morality and What To Do About It, and J.L. Some philosophers have been and are skeptical about the objective status of ethics. Mackie's widely reprinted argument against the objectivity of moral values (from his Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong) might work. And I don't necessarily buy a theory quite that specific even though I agree with 90 per cent of what I read in Mackie's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Mackie's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Part 1. ATHEIST: Well, we've evolved some moral views, and some tendencies to do right and wrong. Probably a philosopher like J.L. It can be found in shortened versions in more than a few intro to ethics texts. The argument you've given is very close Mackie's argument from queerness, posited in "Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Mackie in “The Argument from Queerness,” Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, we see that Sober's claim has weakness.